Quantcast
Channel: SINdie
Viewing all 1157 articles
Browse latest View live

ShoutOUT!: Discussing Singapore Cinema - A 5-week series

$
0
0
Conversations about the identity of Singapore cinema continues with this 5-part series of talks by academic Wong Hongyi. This happens every Tuesday from 26 Jan to 1 Mar 2016, 7.30pm (except 9 Feb) at the Workshop Space at Objectifs.

Entry is by Donation. You can register on the event page.

This series of talks will take a closer look at Singapore cinema by uncovering recurring themes and focusing on the works of several filmmakers. Learn more about how the Singaporean identity has shaped our films, and how it has expressed and influenced our perceptions and understanding of the world.
These talks are organised in conjunction with Objectifs’ Watch Local screenings. Get more information on our Watch Local screenings here.

For further queries, email us at info@objectifs.com.sg.

More details about the talks:

26 January 2016
'Singapore Film: what is it?'
This introductory seminar to the 5-part series will look at Singapore film through a number of identifiable themes and concepts. Ideas like memory, nostalgia, space, identity and the use of Singlish in some of our local films will be examined with examples from various Singaporean filmmakers. A good place to start is the omnibus 7 Letters, itself a part of the numerous initiatives of SG50 and an attempt to look at how Singapore has changed across our five decades of nationhood.

2 February 2016
Art as Alternative Voice
Many times, art is used by the artist to reclaim what has been taken away from the powerless and the marginalised. This seminar looks at how films in Singapore are sometimes a representation of the person in the street with his or her fears and aspirations. In this way, film can be used to validate individuals who are neglected or even rejected by the collective consciousness. Some of the films of younger filmmakers like Boo Junfeng and Kirsten Tan will be featured in this session.

16 February 2016
Director Focus: Jack Neo
This third seminar in the series takes a look at Jack Neo, who is sometimes believed to represent the Everyman in Singapore. His choice to focus on the problems of the masses is arguably the source of his appeal. The issues that he explores may be mundane but many of them are very real. Throughout his filmmaking years, Neo has evolved and developed a bankable formula that works. Some of the films we will watch include Money No Enough, I Not Stupid, Homerun, and Ah Boys to Men.

23 February 2016
Director Focus: Wee Li Lin
A prolific filmmaker in her own right, Wee Li Lin is a master of the short film genre. Starting from Norman on the Air in 1997, which won her an award at the Singapore International Film Festival, Wee has been making films that explore the inner worlds of archetypal, localised characters. In this seminar, we take a look at some of these shorts. Lunch Time is about a coffeeshop assistant who fantasises a better life; Holiday features the sudden retrenchment of an average Singaporean man; and Autograph Book talks about the pains of growing up through the eyes of a 12-year-old.

1 March 2016
Director Focus: Eric Khoo
One of the forerunners in the Singapore film scene, Eric Khoo has contributed to the growth of the industry significantly. He has also influenced a number of young local filmmakers hoping to make their mark in Singapore and abroad. Many of his films are dark symbolisms of existence in urban spaces. The characters featured in films such as Mee Pok Man, 12 Storeys and Be With Me are edgy, displaced and lonely individuals. The way they cope with their lives serves as a mirror for the rest of us who may be grappling with similar issues. In this final seminar of the series, we round up with Khoo and his works.
About the speaker, Wong Hongyi

Wong Hongyi is an academic who teaches film and communication in local tertiary institutions. He received his BA and MA (Literary Studies) from the National University of Singapore. Apart from teaching, he has also developed curriculum for university modules such as Introduction to Film Art and Shakespeare in Film. He believes movies have the power to transcend cultural differences and bring new perspectives to otherwise fettered minds. Apart from film, Hongyi is also interested in literature and writes creatively. He was a contributing writer in the 2014 Singapore Writers’ Festival, leading a literary walk as part of the Festival with fellow writers from the third installment of the Balik Kampung series (forthcoming).

Review: The Songs We Sang

$
0
0
Watching The Songs We Sang (2015) would not have held that much importance for me had it not been a special screening organised by both Hwa Chong Junior College and CHIJ St. Nicholas’ Girls alumnai associations. Surrounded by both fans, participants and their children, it was amazing to feel the audience hold their breath and exhale as one at various points of the film.
I am not very familiar with the genre in this film but I noted that director Eva Tang was audacious enough to not just cover the Xinyao movement from the music industry’s point of view but also from its very humble beginnings in the Chinese medium schools. 

The latter is what makes the film stand out, otherwise it would have been just another documentary, albeit still a good one, on a music movement. Eva Tang is of course, well-known for her work with Royston Tan and Victric Thng in Old Romances (2010) and Old Places(2012) which are social-historical documentaries on Singapore. It is such experience that we see Tang bring to the fore in her debut feature.

The closure of Singapore’s vernacular schools as it made to switch to all English-medium schools was a necessary, yet bitter move in the 1970s as Singapore sought to prepare itself for survival in the world economy. However, Nantah University had been built only two decades before as a pinnacle to Chinese education in Singapore. Thus it is usually such regret that comes to be associated with the switch. 

However, Tang shows us a completely different reaction in Nantah Chinese poetry club’s last days. Within this club, we see poetry and music flourishing dramatically as the university faced its imminent closure; The students creating poetry to express their emotions on the state of affairs and then taking cues from Taiwan’s folksong movement to set their poems to music which became wildly popular. Such creative outpouring of the students, a lesson in how to respond nobly to a traumatic event.
Of course, optimism alone would not have been able to sustain the movement. Tang then traces its increasing popularity to the willingness of a radio disc-jockey who was willing to take a chance on these students, which eventually catapulted them to fame as well as spawning similar movements in various schools across Singapore, leading to television appearances and of course, Singapore’s mandarin music industry as it is today. 

The scope of this research took 3 years to complete as hunting down members of the various bands and producers who have long since taken different paths was not easy. Similarly, Tang’s efforts to film their efforts in their original locations or to substitute with old pictures must be lauded for making this film a fantastic historical record of Singapore. This makes her attempt to organise a reunion concert for the various bands and their supporters, in Bras Brasah (a site where bands originally played), which was filmed for this documentary, all the more outrageous.

I cannot recommend this film well enough for its production values which are impeccable. In a city where archival materials are difficult and expensive to procure while historical places are torn down every other day, Tang has done us a huge favour in documenting the Xinyao movement for posterity. Even if you are not a fan of Xinyao or can’t speak Chinese, like me, the irreverent hope that its pioneers carried and their triumph over adversity holds a universal appeal that everyone can appreciate. Keep an eye out for it when it comes out later this year!

Review by Jenson Chen

@SGIFF2015: Banglasia, Truly Asia

$
0
0
It's been a rough ride for Malaysian director Namewee whose consequent weight loss was noticeable at a press conference at SGIFF 2015. His fourth film 'Banglasia', completed in 2013, has been banned in its country of origin since 2014. The Malaysian Film Censorship Board ask for 31 scenes to be removed or reshot in order for the film to be passed. 

The action-comedy is set in an alternate reality where Malaysia comes under attack from the Luk Luk army. Harris (Nirab Hossain), a blue-collared Bangladeshi worker, emerges as the all-rounded hero in the film. Harris’ courage and generosity gains the friendship and admiration from his employer’s daughter, Siti (Atikah Suhaime), pro-Malaysian activist Han Guo Ren (Namewee), and Han Guo Ren’s demented grandmother (Lao Zha Bo). Transcending boundaries of race, age, and nationality, the motley crew come together to resist the villains thrown their way. 

In my interview with Namewee during SGIFF 2015, he shared that the film attempts to address the problems between Malaysian and 外來人 (foreigners). There is a general animosity towards Bangladeshi workers in Malaysia, which can be traced to the Malaysian government's alleged use of these workers as phantom voters in the last election. At the same, the movie attempts to portray the Bangladeshi worker as a hero.
I caught Banglasia at the SGIFF last December, in a screening that drew much laughter from the audience. Knowing that the film had struck sufficient caution in the authorities to warrant drastic cuts, I'd expected at first a film sharp in its criticism of Malaysian society and politics.


So I was surprised at how lightly the film dealt with a host of socio-political issues, including xenophobia, racism, phantom voting, and corruption. The film flirted with caricatures and conspiracy theories familiar to a Malaysian audience – the extent of its commentary resembling a year in review of people and events trending on Facebook. Namewee did reveal during the interview that Facebook was an important source of material for the film. 


Censorship decisions against the film were thus doubly surprising, and testament to the Malaysian authorities’ flair for imagination.

Made for a Chinese New Year crowd, the film would have been a great complement to the easy laughter and running commentary from friends and relatives gathered for the festive season. The gloom that’d settled over Malaysia after the 2013 elections (and which continues to thicken) could have been momentarily dispelled by Namewee’s attempt at verbalizing and poking fun at the many, many things that frustrate the average citizen.


Unfortunately, Malaysians’ access to the film continue to be restricted. Meanwhile, the film has been screened at the Osaka Asian Film Festival 2015 and the New York Asian Film Festival 2015. To complete the director's cut and secure funding for a global release of the film, Namewee and his team had announced during SGIFF 2015, a 40-day global fundraising kickstarter campaign with a target for USD500,000. It was dubbed the most ambitious film crowdfunding project in Asia in terms of pledge amount.
Namewee also shared in the interview his unusual method of casting for 'Banglasia'. This involved walking into a 'Bangla' DVD shop in Malaysia and trying to find the DVDs in which the same faces popped up the most number of times. He would then ask the shopkeeper who they are. He would only contact these actors after several rounds of shortlisting. What followed was flying to Bangladesh and meeting them face to face. Eventually, they ended up choosing a lead guy who was touted the 'Andy Lau' (famous Hong Kong actor) equivalent of Bangladesh!

A real pity that Malaysians will not get to watch the film. Meanwhile the road to getting it worldwide screening time is also rocky. As of 19thJanuary, the kickstarter fundraising did not meet its target and has since closed. It is not clear what alternatives are available to the team.

Stay tuned while we keep a lookout for this film's latest developments and how you can help!

Article by Teenli Tan








Check out the film's trailer here: 

Interview with Leo Poloniecki (representing Team Zissou) on "The Anniversary"

$
0
0
The Anniversary bagged the most prizes at the recent 48 Hour Film Project (48HFP) Singapore in December 2015, winning the awards for Best Film, Best Directing, Best Use of Props and Audience Choice. We speak with Leo, director and writer of the short film, to find out more about its production.

SYNOPSIS
On the anniversary of her daughter’s death an American real-estate agent has to close the deal on the sale of a shopping mall to a Chinese buyer. The only thing between her and the sale is the buyer’s personal ‘spirit detective’, without whose approval she never says yes to a purchase.




Hi Leo, do tell us more about yourself, and how you & your team for the 48HFP got together-

I am currently working as a commercials director for Freeflow Productions. I have made a handful of short films and, as a writer in advertising, many adverts. The team for the 48HFP slowly came together through a mix of friends, generous people from work and kind actors who agreed to come aboard and help us out. 

Really creative use of the prop (BBQ tongs)! 
Did the idea of using a BBQ tong come quickly, or was it something you conveniently threw into the story? I believe I have seen Chinese mediums use some sort of fork when doing contact with the netherworld, but a BBQ tong is really one up! 

Haha! Yes. Once we had decided on the character of a ‘Spirit Detective’ we had a bit of fun thinking of all the strange and weird things he could do to ‘test for ghosts’ in the building. In comparison to some of the other ideas we had, using the BBQ tongs like a tuning fork actually seemed on the sensible side! 

I thought that your use of line was really good; I have yet to watch the winning entry for the Best Line prize, but the little girl screaming at the end was really creepy, and I was also very impressed with her delivery (though it was just one line). Have you made many horror films in the past? The Anniversary felt very naturally done, much smoother than how I would envisage a 48 hour film to be like.

It's only natural that, when racing to get a whole piece done in just 48 hours, a certain amount of mania is likely to appear on the screen! I'm not quite sure why our piece ended up having a very calm feeling to it. Certainly, while shooting, it never felt like a big panic and no one lost their cool. I suppose the spirits of the building must have been smiling on us. As for little Eva - yes, she did a perfect job delivering the line. It comes over satisfactorily spookily... despite the fact that she couldn't stop giggling while doing the shoot! 


And the inevitable question, what were the challenges you faced in directing a 48hfp? I am sure many people would have asked you this, but filming in a shopping (as dilapidated it was) probably has its constraints, permission from management, security guards chasing you out etc., so...how did you go about gaining access to the filming venue, and how did you manage to bring together such a wide range of actors? Also, do share with us how long did you take to write the story, organize the shoot, do the filming, edit, etc..Will also like to know how much the making of your film cost (HAHA! Singaporean question), if you don't mind sharing.

It’s funny you should mention trouble from security guards. There was a security guard there and he did approach us to tell us to clear off. When we showed him the papers to show that we had permission from the building’s management, he suddenly went completely the other way in terms of his attitude to the production. He was virtually holding the boom microphone by the end of the day - we probably couldn’t have made the film without him! As for the questions about timing, the writing all happened on the Friday night. So we had the rest of the weekend to shoot, edit and grade. The costs were pretty minimal because of the competition rule that all participants have to contribute on a volunteer basis. I think the hiring of some kit, the competition entry and then other stuff like transport and food all came to about S$800. 


Is there a director whose work you admire, or any film you had in mind when you were making The Anniversary? I couldn't really put a finger to it, but old building + little creepy girl + nervous middle aged lady + silent slightly-crazy chinese man....

With the 48HFP you can’t prepare much in advance because of the nature of being told your genre and so on when you arrive on the Friday night. However, we did know our location. And so, thinking about that, this empty abandoned and creepy space (like the Overlook Hotel), we found ourselves looking at a lot of Stanley Kubrick’s framing. He uses a lot of “one-point perspective” shots which suited us very well. So we pretty much copied that directly! 

*Spoiler alert*

Not very clear on whom the little girl was actually speaking to, and not wanting to settle for my best guess, I sought clarity from Leo.





Quick answer: It is the ghost of the woman's daughter speaking directly to her. 

Long answer: We always saw the building itself as being a character in the film. Almost the strongest character. The building has a will of its own. And it doesn't want to be sold. It wants to assert itself. So, sensing this unresolved issue in Mrs Anderson's life, the building conjures up the ghost of Mrs Anderson's daughter in order to ruin the prospect of the sale. When the daughter says "Look at what you did, you..." (which is the mandatory line of dialogue for the competition) we feel she is talking about the failure to sell the building. But perhaps more than that... perhaps this is a wider comment about Mrs Anderson's failings as a parent - which may or may not have had a role to play in the daughter's death. 


Interested yet? Watch The Anniversity here at this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1HWW1BHygo 

Photo credit: Leo Poloniecki

[Review] The Anniversary by Team Zissou, for the 48HFP (Singapore)

$
0
0

The predecessor to all film competitions with a time limit, the 48 Hour Film Project (HFP) made its yearly visit to Singapore last December 2015, and Team Zissou made a record-breaking debut, sweeping away most of the awards such as Best Film, Best Directing, Best Use of Prop and the Audience Award (For Group A).

A stipulated genre, line, prop and character had to be utilized in the submission of a maximum of 7 minutes within 48 hours, certainly stretching the participating teams’ creativity and stamina to the limit. Suffice to say, Team Zissou, led by director and writer Leo Poloneiki, who is a commercials director at FreeFlow Productions, applied his professional touch to the game, making their submission, “The Anniversary” come off as one real smooth thriller masterpiece with loads of ingenuity peppered into it.

Set in a dilapidated shopping centre, a nervous middle-aged Caucasian lady seeks to sell a property, a building she lauds as a historical landmark. Elsewhere, a spirit detective tests the air for beings of the netherworld; the sale of the building dependent on his findings. A film with adaptation of all elements of your usual thriller/horror feast, Leo admits the similarities The Anniversary share with The Shining (By Stanley Kubrick) as purposeful and calculated, such as the adopting of the “one-point perspective”.


And Mr Kubrick would be rightfully pleased! The Anniversary even leaves its viewer hanging with the non-conclusion at the end, like any good short film would. To watch The Anniversary, click here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1HWW1BHygo 

Photo credit: 48HFP

Review - Long Long Time Ago by Jack Neo

$
0
0

In Jack Neo’s Long Long Time Ago, the progress of the central family closely follows the progress of Singapore starting from its independence in 1965. The beginning of Neo’s film in this momentous year naturally invites it being compared to the film 1965. In both film’s representation of national issues, the Singapore in Neo’s film feels more current in exemplifying the nation’s pragmatism in problem-solving. The second racial riot in the second half of the film is resolved by civil servants personally dispelling myths about racial conspiracies; a lesson learnt from the first racial riot that is explored by 1965. This is just one of the ways in which Neo portrays national politics differently, even at times exercising subtlety.


The film doesn’t rethread other national issues addressed in Neo’s previous films, most prominently the necessity and benefit of National Service that premised the Ah Boys To Men films. As the youngest brother of the central family is enlisted, Wang Weiliang and Tosh Zhang make brief appearances as soldiers sending the first batch of NS men to camp (Perhaps in this film, they’re Lobang and Sergeant Alex’s ancestors themselves). Neo even gets a bit controversial in portraying LKY’s reputation in the ‘60s. Unlike the reverence paid to him in 1965, the men of the central family have yet to become in awe of him, even going as far to doubt the sincerity of his tears in his iconic speech. There’s a bit of realism here with the ordinary locals feeling distant from the public figure and having no notion of his future legacy. The political figures they eventually connect to is the PAP minister seen repeatedly amidst their community and more significantly, the Indian Inspector Officer who develops from a threatening caricature to a friendly face.


Unlike the rapid progress of Singapore, the interfamilial relations of the main characters makes little progress despite the trials they have undergone. Initially, the focus on Zhao Di distinguishes this film from Neo’s predominantly male-centric team. As Zhao Di exerts effort to prove that she’s not the load of the family with three daughters, she gradually becomes the family’s most effective breadwinner on top of readily being the primary peacemaker. Neo seems to be persuading traditional families to be more appreciative of their female family members, especially when Zhao Di is contrasted against her older brother Ah Kun. Unlike her enterprising sister, Ah Kun is the typical, entitled eldest son who makes more trouble than contributions. We’re obviously supposed to criticize Ah Kun for his troublemaking ways. Yet as his large screen time is disproportionate to his improvement as a person, the film inadvertently reinforces the hierarchy in the family which allows Ah Kun to be given much while he gets away with giving little back. This hierarchy remains largely in place in the family as they remain largely unappreciative of Zhao Di’s achievements since it is the ‘60s, after all.


There is already a sequel prepared to depict more of this bygone age. Clips of Part 2 shown at the end not only promises more fuel for nostalgic trips, but also previews of narrative twists up ahead such as the joining of a Chinese and Indian family through an interracial marriage. The inevitable family melodrama in Neo’s films maybe tedious, but that doesn’t dissipate the warmth that drives this project. As the credits roll accompanied with old black and white photos from the contributors’ personal collection, there is the sense that the people behind Long Long Time Ago are more than collaborators, but rather a collaborative community akin to a family.

Review by Joseline Yu

Review - 'Homeground' by Jacen Tan

$
0
0
In 2005, filmmaker Jacen Tan made Singapore’s first viral short film perhaps even before the word ‘viral’ was a buzz word. Shot on digital camera, ‘Tak Giu’ which garnered about 100,000 views in 6 months was somewhat like a special interest (soccer) film that crossed audience groups owing to its plain-speaking humour, honest style and highly-relatable lingo. 10 years later, Jacen revisits the old turf of soccer (well, never really old) with a new short film titled ‘Homeground’. ‘Homeground’ is, on instant viewing, visually more polished, colour-graded to perfection, cinematographically refined by today’s conventions and so cleanly-scripted, it could pass off as a national campaign commercial. This is hardly surprising as it is supported (not sure if in sponsorship) by POSB’s neighbourhood loving campaign neightboursfirst.sg . Certainly, in recent times, the government and organisations have tried to own the space in film and short films for purposes of cultivating their respective messages, by sponsoring the works of certain ‘annointed’ filmmakers. 


Enjoy the cult-classic Tak Giu here:
Beyond the technical achievements, ‘Homeground’ falls a little short on being the sequel or a closure piece to ‘Tak Giu’. I am sure it is not meant to be a sequel for ‘Tak Giu’ was entertaining, comic fiction with the unmistakable heartland voice of a boys who can make any concrete corner a soccer playing field, while Homeground was a straight-laced documentary that sought the voices of a social cross-section of soccer enthusiasts, who were all very behaved in front of the camera. Almost too well-behaved. ‘Homeground’ does however, cover grounds (pardon the pun) similar to ‘Tak Giu’. ‘Tak Giu’ was a tongue-in-cheek plea to the government for more spaces for playing soccer, so that soccer fans (presumably a lot in Singapore), do to have a play a cat and mouse game with the neighourhood-patrolling policemen. Fast forward 10 years, ‘Homeground’ reveals a Singapore much more accommodating to soccer with seemingly more playing spaces, even for foreign workers. It documents a string of regular soccer games played at several venues in Singapore from Chinatown to Bukit Timah, from Serangoon to Seletar. Through interspersing these different stories with each other, ‘Homeground’ paints an informative cross-section of Singapore demographics. There are racial representations of each kind (even Ang Mohs), women, foreign workers and even seniors like the film’s anchor character, taxi-driver, Steven Wong (photo below). it is almost like a utopian world of soccer enthusiasts of every background who are all united by their love for soccer. 

While the film makes for highly-glossed TV infotainment, it sacrifices the bite of its predecessor ‘Tak Giu’. ’Take Giu’ is like the ‘Money No Enough’ of the soccer world, where 3 characters come together, trying to navigate their way through HDB spaces forbidden for games, and trying to find that golden field on the side of the road, literally. It succeeded in capturing the hearts of many online viewers, with the void-deck-style conversations of 3 buddies. ‘Homeground’, to cut Jacen some slack, is perhaps a film with a simpler ambition, basically to document the state of a hobby, a rather common one. Besides offering a fitting tribute to well-liked past-time, there are also elements in the film that offer something for non-soccer fans. Characters like the young girl who plays soccer at the foreign workers’ quarter with her father and of course, Steven Wong himself, who defies age (and his nagging wife) to pursue a passion, lift this film above infotainment status. You never go wrong with doing good portraits!

Review by Jeremy Sing

Enjoy 'Homeground' the full short film here:

ShoutOUT!: 5 pairs of tickets to 'Anomalisa' to be given!

$
0
0
Dear readers, SINdie is giving away 5 pairs of tickets to the preview of the movie 'Anomalisa'.

This is a darkly-comedic stop-motion feature about a man's own journey through his soul. Michael Stone, husband, father and respected author of "How May I Help You Help Them?" is a man crippled by the mundanity of his life. On a business trip to Cincinnati, where he's scheduled to speak at a convention of customer service professionals, he checks into the Fregoli Hotel. There, he is amazed to discover a possible escape from his desperation in the form of an unassuming Akron baked goods sales rep, Lisa, who may or may not be the love of his life. 

Created by Charlie Kaufman and Duke Johnson, this film features the vocal cast of Jennifer Jason Leigh, Tom Noonan and David Thewlis and a stirring strings-based score by Carter Burwell.  


This film is rated R21 - SEXUAL SCENE AND NUDITY
'Anomalisa' opens at Cathay Cineplexes and The Projector on 18 February.

To win a pair of tickets, here is what you need to do:

1) Watch this trailer

2) Answer a question on SINdie's Facebook posting on 'Anomalisa'
3) Like and share SINdie's Facebook posting on 'Anomalisa'

This contest runs from 12 to 14 February only!

Here is the trailer:



Preview Screening Details
Date:     17 Feb (Wednesday)
Time:     7pm
Venue:  The Projector @ 6001 Beach Road, Golden Mile Tower, #05-00 (nearest MRT is Nicoll Highway)

Winners can collect their tickets from our redemption table @ The Projector on the day of the event.
Audience watching the show must be above 21 years of age.
2016 ©Par. Pics.

Production talk with Director Derrick Lui on "1400"

$
0
0
1400 is a labour of love over 5 years by Director/Producer Derrick Lui as his first feature. Set in a hotel, we get to see 4 loosely-linked stories of love. Featuring a range of characters as diverse as young PMEBs to a middle-aged uncle and even a foreigner, we get to see love in its full glory, warts and all.

Director Derrick Lui has kindly agreed to do an interview with Sindie for his film, 1400, that was screened at GV Vivocity on 11th February 2016.

1. Derrick, you started your first feature on a micro-budget over quite a long period of time. How was the production process? I'm sure there must have been some interesting stories!
It was a long and arduous process. No one knows on the 3rd day of production, i almost broke down as i was exhausted, doing too many jobs at the same time.


2. What were some of the challenges you met in raising finances for this film?
I spent 5 years meeting everyone i knew in the industry, trying to raise money and do a film the proper way.
The problem was i wanted to make 1400 without a script, and no one will assist without seeing a script!


3. I noticed that you went so far as to produce not one but two music videos for 1400. Why did you decide to make these MVs and do they reveal anything about the film?
The 2 MVs featured original songs sang by Tay Kewei. I felt the songs were refreshing, and the 2 MVs were good ways to introduce the songs. The songs were specifically written for 2 stories in the film, so they do reveal the respective shots from the stories.



4. Did you have any difficulties or surprises in casting for your film? Were there any interesting responses when they read the script?
I think the most tricky casting job was the role of a prostitute. I didn't want a girl to play a showy outgoing character. Instead, i wanted the prostitute to be introvert and tired of the job, somebody that wouldnt mind doing bed scenes, yet will be able to play a character that the audience will feel pity for.


5. This film was inspired by 3 of your close friends' troubles with romance. Aren't you terrified that they will knock on your door once they find out that your film is based on them?
So far they haven't knocked on my door :) To be honest the stories were inspired, but they were all improved somewhat to be more interesting.



6. Which of the 4 stories is your favourite? Is there anything we should look out for?
This is a difficult question. It's like asking me which of my 4 children is my favourite? The answer is i like them all :)
Each story deals with different characters with different age ranges in different situations. Based on the Gala, the responses were you will like at least 2 stories if not all!


7. You said previously that while you were glad to have attended film festivals with 1400, you were hoping to get this film distributed in Singapore. Were there any difficulties getting it certified?
Yes, if you make a film without a recognised movie company or producer behind it, it is very difficult to get a theatrical release.


8. Now that we've had the gala premiere, when can everyone else get to see this in theatres?
We're still in discussions about a theatrical release.


9. 1400 won Best Feature Film in flEXiff 2015 of Sydney, Australia. Please tell us about the audience in Australia. Were there any interesting responses at Montreal or any other film festival screenings?
Strangely enough, whether the audience was in Montreal, Sydney or Singapore, they all reacted the same way at appropriate times. They did surprise me a bit with their preference of stories and characters though. But it was universal. Good films and stories should be able to evoke emotions in any culture.

@SGIFF2015: Review - Snow Pirates

$
0
0
Faruk Hacihafizoglu makes his directorial debut with Snow Pirates, a coming-of-age story set against the fraying situation of the 1980 military coup, whose tensions are felt in a small Turkish village. Serhat, Gurbuz and Ibo are three pre-pubescent teenagers fumbling around in a rapidly deteriorating situation. Childhood innocence is thrown into the mix of a despotic grown-up world, one in which the harsh winter haunts them in every corner. 

With a dichotomous relationship between games and reality from the very onset, school and football games rapidly metamorphose into a very real struggle for survival against the bitter cold. The tension continually builds as the three set out for coal under a tight military regime that has soldiers briskly patrolling the chalk-white streets. 

Their naivety poses a stark opposition to the severity of the situation, made even more intense when youthful antics are put at play. Sitting on their crude wooden sleds on which they pile their finds on, they slide and yank each other along the pristine slopes while on the search for coal to warm their homes. While they remain relatively carefree, the deteriorating situation is made brutally obvious to viewers.
Mingled with moments of humour, it is desperation and familial ties that delineate the stifling pervasion of childhood innocence. The incongruity between events and the manner in which the schoolboys react captures the essence of children caught in the midst of a tumultuous reality. It is in the nuances in performance, the startlingly beautiful backdrop and the crisp audio, that captivates and pulls viewers right into a very genuinely presented experience. 


Review by Chris Yeo


This review is part of the Asian Feature Film Competition series at the Singapore International Film Festival 2015. Read more about the film here.

@SGIFF2015: Review - The Fourth Direction

$
0
0
In the history books during the film’s period of reference, the road to the famed golden temple at Amritsar was treacherous and ill-fated. In the film ‘The Fourth Direction’, the journey to Amritsar as taken by a few men, both physical and mental, also proved to be uncertain, difficult and particularly wayward. This is a film that takes several steps off the conventional beaten narrative track, breaking some rules in storytelling, edging on our curiosity and sense of adventure at some points and making us scratch our heads at most other points.

‘The Fourth Direction’ aims to explore the climate of tension between the Sikh militants and the Indian government during the period of Operation Blue Star in 1984. Perhaps this film will give new meaning to the word obtuse. The film meditates on a few simple encounters hoping to provide enough colour to complete its portrait of the troubled times. It follows the trail of two men, Jugal and Raj, who are trying to hop on to the last train that will take them to Amritsar. They managed to nudge their way onto the last carriage, only to find it filled with others equally desperate as them. The second set of encounters manifests itself through the memory of Jugal. Centred around a Sikh family whom Jugal stumbles upon by chance, it recounts their experience trying to shelter a Sikh militant friend from the Indian military and their dilemma with a dog that refused to stop barking.
The strangest part of the film is the way director Gulvinder Singh joins up the dots in the plot without any real causal connection from one segment to another. The narrative trail takes us from the first set of encounters at the train station and the train carriage to the second set of encounters in the house of Joginder, aka the Sikh family with the dog, with each segment having no bearing on the other. For all the masterful build-ups, the anticipation of full-blown clashes, the expected window to the world of Operation Blue Star, we are left short-changed at several points in the film. The film skips the visual and narrative gratification for something more atmospheric and also skips completing what it meant to ignite. 

On one hand, being insulated from the real depth of the conflict seems to do Operation Blue Star a real injustice. One the other hand, its focussed depiction of micro battles, like those that happened within the Joginder household compound, brings home, excuse the pun, the human issues on a more profound level. Particularly effective is the use of the dog as a focal point of condensed tension between the various people who, stand at different sides of the conflict, driven more by circumstances than pure ideology. It provides an angle through which to study the various human motives and stakes involved in the situation. Director Gulvinder is also evidently sensitive to sound interplay in the film, having created an aural ambience that evokes the presence of conflict larger than what the visuals show. From the running sound of the train, the chirping of cricket choirs to the starker sounds like the dog’s barking and gunshots, sounds in this film function like narrative sign posts, signalling our journey from one point of the story to the next, creating a sense of immersion in the situation. All in all, these stylistic and technical triumphs do not hide the fact that the film has many voids to fill and it takes a lot more storytelling rigour, than the director has exercised, to make this journey back in history complete.


Review by Jeremy Sing



This review is part of the Asian Feature Film Competition series at the Singapore International Film Festival 2015. Read more about the film here.

This film won the Best Film Award in the SGIFF 2015 Asian Feature Film Competition.

ShoutOUT!: Watch Local @ Objectifs: First Short. First Feature.

$
0
0
Still from Raihan Halim's 'Banting'

The Watch Local programme is back at Objectifs! This year's series features the first short and feature films from an eclectic selection of Singapore filmmakers such as Boo Junfeng, Wee Li Lin, and Liao Jiekai. Each night will focus on a different director, giving a unique perspective on each one’s creative journey from their first short film to their first feature film. Post-screening discussions will accompany some of the sessions, allowing the audience insight into how these filmmakers have grown in their craft. From comedy to horror to drama, there’s something for everyone!

23 Feb to 4 Mar 2016, 7.30pm 
Chapel Gallery, Objectifs
Admission: Entry by donation

Screenings are free but pre-registration is required via Peatix: http://ptix.co/1U6yD1P
Please also note that some films are rated M18 and R21. We will be adhereing strictly to age limits for restricted age shows. Please bring along your IC or equivalent.

Programme Schedule

23 FEBRUARY, TUESDAY / 7.30PM / RAIHAN HALIM / PG 
First Short: Sunat / 2009
First Feature: Banting / 2014


24 FEBRUARY, WEDNESDAY / 7.30PM / LIAO JIEKAI / PG 
First Short: Paradise / 2006
First Feature: Red Dragonfiles / 2010


25 FEBRUARY, THURSDAY / 7.30PM / WEE LI LIN / PG
First Short: Norman on the Air / 1997
First Feature: Gone Shopping / 2007

26 FEBRUARY, FRIDAY / 7.30PM / CHAI YEE WEI / M18
First Short: Lao Sai / 2005
First Feature: Blood Ties / 2007


27 FEBRUARY, SATURDAY / 7.30PM / RIC AW / PG
First Short: Buy Me Love / 2005
First Feature: Standing In Still Water / 2014

28 FEBRUARY, SUNDAY / 3PM / DJINN / M18
First Short: By the Dawn’s Early Rise / 1998
First Feature: Perth / 2004

1 MARCH, TUESDAY / 7.30PM / YONG MUN CHEE / R21
First Short: 9:30 / 2004
First Feature: Where the Road Meets the Sun / 2011

2 MARCH, WEDNESDAY / 7.30PM / MENG ONG / PG13
First Short: China Doll / 1991
First Feature: Miss Wonton / 2001

3 MARCH, THURSDAY / 7.30PM / KAN LUME / PG
First Short: The Assassin / 2004
First Feature: The Art of Flirting / 2006

4 MARCH, FRIDAY / 7.30PM / BOO JUNFENG / M18
First Short: A Family Portrait / 2004
First Feature: Sandcastle / 2010

Short Films That Leave Us Thinking: A Conversation

$
0
0
Some films ground us in the action of the moment. But others leave us with lingering thoughts, even after many days after viewing.

Last month, we encountered a selection of contemplative short films that have left them musing about migration, family love and nostalgia for the past. Titled “Spirits of Cinema”, the screening featured shorts by the local collective 13 Little Pictures, with the programme co-curated by the collective and the Institute of Contemporary Arts Singapore (ICA), in lieu of Singapore Art Week.

SINdie writers Choon Ling and Sharanya chat about their experience watching these films under the stars at the special outdoor screening in LaSalle’s campus.
The Films:

KOPI JULIA (Tan Bee Thiam, 2013)
TICKETS (Sherman Ong, 2010)
A LION’S PRIDE (Wesley Leon Aroozoo, 2008)
MY FATHER AFTER DINNER (Gladys Ng, 2015)
ANIMAL SPIRITS (Daniel Hui, 2013)
AN AUTUMN AFTERNOON (Lei Yuan Bin , 2015)
SILENT LIGHT (Liao Jiekai, 2015)
THE MINOTAUR (Yeo Siew Hua, 2015)

Sharanya (S): Which film was your favourite?

Choon Ling (C): Tickets definitely left a deep impression on me. I liked how minimalistic it was in terms of visuals and sound. It only had two different scenes — one was the interview itself, while the other one was the protagonist tending to the ticket box — and it was scored with a natural diegetic track. Despite only presenting the barest of the film medium, it managed to pull us into the story. It didn’t feel like it was 10 minutes long!

Sherman Ong’s Tickets

S: Yeah, and I found the ticket box very interesting! It’s a rare sight in Singapore nowadays, especially how the protagonist manually takes the tickets from the drawer to pass to the customers. It’s not like the modern cinema where tickets are just printed out of machines, and you don’t even think twice about it.

C: That’s true! It’s fascinating, how the film was shot at the former Oriental Theatre. I think the director wanted to pay tribute to a forgotten time and place, where movie theatres promised dreams and magic for the people. And the actress was a natural. Even though we were just listening to her talking, It’s almost as if we’re in the room with her!

S: It was nice how the film plays on the concept of how everyday people have such moving stories. You don’t really need to look very far to get a good one. I think especially here, in Singapore, there tends to be a bit of resistance towards Chinese nationals. But while she was sharing her own hopes and dreams, it didn’t feel like she was of a different nationality.

C: Yeah! I guess that’s the point of the film, to highlight how the immigrants that some of us are prejudiced against are actually just like us, with the same kind of dreams. I suppose that’s why this film is my favourite of the lot. It had a strong message and managed to move me with the bare essentials.

What about you? What was your favourite film?

S: I would say The Minotaur. I was entranced by it; I couldn’t take my eyes off the screen. The whole feel of it reminded me of short film, The Ghost King by Dick Chua. It’s a documentary about this annual ritual in a Malaysian town where they would burn the paper statues of the Gods. It’s also filmed at night and has very riveting, slightly eerie music. So this film really transported me back to that. I think I enjoy this genre of films!

Yeo Siew Hua’s The Minotaur

C: Like horror?

S: It’s a little horror, but not exactly. More like mythology. I find Chinese mythology very fascinating!

C: It is! Especially when they are about the 18 levels of hell. I like how the film started with the Ah Gong (grandfather) trying to scare his grandson through the myth.

S: Yeah! This is not the nurturing kind of Ah Gong. I like how the boy doesn’t cry. He’s not a whiney kid, he’s actually quite independent. And I think the sound really intensified the mystery of the whole storyline. Even without the visuals, I think it would have been just as impactful as an audio-story.

C: Yeah, I agree! What really stood out for me when watching the film was the venue. It enhanced the horror experience quite dramatically. There were moments in the film where there was silence and I could feel the entire atmosphere thickening.

S: That’s true! I think that made it even better. This film was very heavily stylised, kind of the opposite of Tickets. But it didn’t feel heavy-handed!

C: I thought that this was a very nice ending to the entire programme.

S: Yeah! And it’s interesting that they also started the programme with another horror film, Kopi Julia. Though it’s a very different kind of horror.

Tan Bee Thiam’s Kopi Julia

C: From the description it says that the film fuses two different genres — silent films and Malay horror. That’s interesting because I’ve never been exposed to Malay horror films. Maybe this is the gateway to a sub-genre. The film was a bit comedic too! Especially with the overacting and title cards and light plot. A Lion’s Pride is totally different! It was a fun eight minutes.

S: I still took it seriously until the lions started mating! I guess they were trying to mock those National Geographic documentaries!

C: Right! I think it’s interesting because it took a familiar cultural symbol and subverted its myth. It’s an alternate universe where nian wasn’t chased away and survived! I wonder how the elderly Chinese audience felt about it…

S: I think they might have been a bit horrified by the humping.

C: They probably were!

S: I think it’s good that they put it in the middle, after a very serious one like Tickets. That was more introspective, and this one just makes you laugh! And then after that is another introspective one: My Father After Dinner, which won best local short film at the recent Singapore International Film Festival.

Gladys Ng’s My Father After Dinner

C: This felt the most local out of all the films. It’s the most relatable one.

S: It actually reminded me of my mum. She used to work night shifts, and like the father in the film, she would prepare food and remind me and my sister to eat. And we wouldn’t see each other most of the time, as though we were living in different timezones!

C: Oh! And you’re living that life right now, because of your night shifts!

S: Yeah! Even in this film, the girl only meets her father when he comes back home. It’s something I’m experiencing now, so it’s quite relatable. When I see security guards working night shifts at my office, I always wonder what their story is. Some of them look really young, some of them look like they’ve retired. I think they all have interesting backstories that bring them to this job.

C: That’s true. I like how the director uses food to symbolise the father’s love. He cooks this sumptuous feast for the family every weekend but he just keeps the leftover rice for himself to fry the next day. You could tell he really loves his children.

S: It’s like Tickets, they didn’t have to look for an exotic story to make a compelling film.

C: Yeah! And the film features the director’s actual father, so that’s interesting. I guess this is really a slice of the director’s life. But the next film, Animal Spirits, is not directly inspired by the filmmaker’s own life. Instead, it’s a Singaporean filming an American and Korean story in America. I like how international it is.

S: I guess for me, it was less relatable, maybe because it was set in America. So there might be certain nuances that are just lost on me. But I thought the contrast was nice, between a native and an immigrant. Immigration seems to be a big issue in many local films.

C: Especially because we have such a high volume of people coming in! This film is interesting because although it’s talking about the same issues — moving, sacrifice, hopes and dreams — it’s from the perspective of an American lady moving to another state and a Korean immigrant who’s living and studying in the US.

S: I guess the common theme for them is that they kind of believed that they had gotten their big break when they moved. Just to realise that things are not as rosy. And I think that’s something immigrants everywhere experience. You just move somewhere and realise this is not what you signed up for.

C: That’s true. I find this surprising, but I actually really liked An Autumn Afternoon. Mainly because even though I watch slow films, I’m not particularly attracted to them. But for this film, even though there was no human protagonist, the place and space dominate the screen, like the cemetery and train station setting. That was really interesting to me! It felt like a documentary without narration.

Lei Yuan Bin’s An Autumn Afternoon

S: Even for me. Before this, I was very bad at appreciating slow films. This film was inspired by Ozu, and I’ve watched two Ozu films — Tokyo Story and Late Spring. And I have to confess I initially found it very hard to concentrate during the long, static shots. But eventually, I learnt to stay with the director as he explored different elements within the frame. And it was a similar experience watching An Autumn Afternoon. The director chose very interesting locations and objects to explore, like a tombstone.

C: Right, and it was oddly peaceful!

S: It really was!

C: The title definitely put the film in perspective. The film really captured the essence of what an autumn afternoon in Japan feels like. The quiet setting, the warmth of the sun, the unnoticeable passing of time… The venue again complemented the audio-visual experience! I remember it was really windy that night, and we were sitting there admiring the calm beauty of Japan. It really added to whatever’s on screen.

S: And it’s really nice because the film is outdoors, and you are outdoors. I thought there were really nice little subplots happening within the frame. It mimics the experience of just sitting somewhere and observing your surroundings.

C: Just people watching, like looking at the trees moving. It really encapsulates times passing. It’s real time. And you hardly get that in a lot of recent films because they are usually narratively driven.

S: Yeah, they usually try to manipulate time.

C: And this just presents time! I think nowadays with everyone being so busy, you don’t actually experience time yourself.

S: Actually, there were a lot of people at the start. I realised towards Animal Spirits and An Autumn Afternoon, people started leaving. In a way, these kinds of films test us. Are we so busy that we can’t even afford the time to just sit and stay with a film? I guess the thing about slow films is that it requires trust in the filmmaker, and when your trust is not betrayed then you feel very happy!

C: Yeah, you’ll feel like you are rewarded. I guess with slow films, the directorial vision is very prominent. You are forced to see what the director wants you to see. Without words! Which is really hard, actually.

S: I’m wondering if the ordering of the different locations had any significance.

C: Actually, it’s true! I don’t really remember the exact ordering, but now that you mention, it feels like he started off with quieter and stiller shots, like a secluded area with minimal movement, before slowly introducing civilisation.

S: It’s a bit like Silent Light!

Liao Jiekai’s Silent Light

C: Yeah, because it’s also talking about time, but in a completely different way. Because it’s about his grandmother’s funeral, and you can tell that he’s missing his grandmother, but in a very subtle manner. Even the use of old film. Initially I thought this was made like ten, twenty years ago. Because of the film texture.

S: Right, 16mm.

C: And it’s expired film stock! I feel like this was chosen deliberately. Because he’s with his grandmother’s passing.

S: How do you know that it’s expired?

C: The texture. And then you see the noise in weird areas. And there was this part where they had the black lines.

S: Right! I think there was some discolouration as well.

C: Yeah! That’s why I thought it was something from so many years ago. And it was interesting because the film was very voyeuristic. Observatory. Like shots of the empty funeral parlour and stuff. You could really feel that this film is like a tribute to his grandmother. The woman recounting her memories, growing up in the early 1960s… You can almost imagine that her story is his grandmother’s story, even though this is not her talking.

S: Yeah! I watched another one of Liao Jiekai’s short films at SGIFF last year, Darkroom. It was a documentary about this photographer who still believes in using the traditional darkroom technique for her experimental photography. And the film used a technique very similar to Silent Light; he overlaid shots of the darkroom process with the conversation he had with the photographer. I think he likes to experiment with how narration doesn’t necessarily have to sync with what he’s showing you, but how it creates a different feel.

C: He’s really using film as a medium. Kudos to that!

S: Yeah! He believes very strongly in using traditional film. Singapore films always make me feel very nostalgic. I mean Kopi Julia is nostalgia, Tickets, maybe a little.

C: And I guess like the overall programme was really really interesting because you got to see so many different kinds of genres. And the entire experience was very varied, which I really liked.

S: I was quite surprised there were a lot of people there.

C: Yeah especially because it was short films! Like usually short films don’t get an audience. And the variety of people that were there! It’s interesting how older people were also drawn to the programme. When I saw the programmme on Facebook, I didn’t really know what to expect even though I had the lineup, because not all of them have trailers.

S: I think it’s so hard to make a trailer for a short film, because it’s already so short!

C: It’s like how much can you show without showing the entire thing! And I guess the thing with short films is like, it’s a screening. For movies you have the synopsis, trailer for you to get to know the film before you watch it. But like for short films, you don’t get that kind of introduction. So when you go there you are trusting the filmmaker, and the curators. You are trusting their taste.

Tony Yeow, the 'has-been who never was'?

$
0
0
I was one degree of separation away from the late Tony Yeow about 6 years ago when I had the opportunity of meeting ex-bipolar patient Choo Kah Ying who turned her life around after being hit by the mental disorder. She told me she had plans to turn her life story into a movie and she had already found a producer. That producer was Tony Yeow. I had an inkling that Tony was a well-known person in the film circle because I had seen this name pop up a few times in film programme booklets. At the same time, I surmised that he must be quite senior based on the fact that his name does not pop up among the younger class of filmmakers that were emerging in the late 2000s. 

The first time I saw him was at the screening of Saint Jack at the national museum where he attended in the capacity of being one of the key crew members. Of course, in the presence of other bigger personalities like veteran Chinese actress Lisa Lu and the cast, his presence was sidelined. Most of the people involved in Saint Jack, made in the 70s, are no longer active in the film industry, so my impression of Tony Yeow went along those lines. Little did I know what this man did for the film industry would reverberate in my thoughts as much as his deep, radio-presenter voice.

Tony Yeow can be argued to be the person who sparked the first flame for Singapore movie-making after its long drought in the 1980s, with the film ‘Medium Rare’. ‘Medium Rare’ was based on the true story of murderer Adrian Lim who drank the blood of children. Having started his filmmaking journey earlier in the 70s, he never stopped searching for film stories and ideas and ’Medium Rare’ was one of the fruits of his labour. Though he ignited the engine of this film project, he eventually stepped down as director due to some disagreements. Some would remember how a Caucasian man was strangely cast to play Adrian Lim. This and many more trivia about him and his films were shared at ‘Remembering Tony’, a talk presented by film writer Ben Slater, attended by players in the film industry who had brushed shoulders with Tony or were simply here to open their eyes into the world of a filmmaker whose efforts were invested at the worst time for any filmmaker to be producing anything in Singapore. 
Still from 'Tony's Long March'

Ben showed a documentary film made by himself and filmmaker Sherman Ong during the talk, titled ‘Tony’s Long March’, about Tony and his films. In the video, Tony called himself ‘The has-been who never was’, based on the fact that his films won won neither commercial success nor critical acclaim. While the video aimed to explore the rigour of Tony’s passion for filmmaking and expression, it undeniably sounded like a ‘Why Tony Yeow was a failed filmmaker’ exposition. Tony unabashedly recounts the trials and tribulations of his journey as a filmmaker, and does not mince his words when turning the microscope on himself on why each film failed. 

Discussing this chronologically, he recounted his first setback with his first film ‘Ring of Fury’, made in 1973. ‘Ring of Fury’ was about a hawker who wanted to get rid of gangsters and underwent some ass-kicking kungfu training to become a fighter. Though a honest dig at the state of gangsterism in Singapore at that time, which was rife, the government banned it for depicting gangsters as they were in the process of ‘cleaning up’ Singapore. This film did not to see the light of day until about 20 years later when Channel 8 TV broadcast the movie. Tony then went on to discuss the second time success eluded him - ‘Two Nuts’. ’Two Nuts’, a comedy about fishermen out-of-water, which his wife found ridiculous, failed to stay afloat in the box office. After a job at Mandarin hotel and an aborted attempt at ‘Medium Rare’, ‘Tiger’s Whip’, made in 1998, was another concerted shot at hitting gold in the box office. That too was a miscalculated shot as it was not only not well-received at home, it failed to attract distributors in the US, despite a salient dose of ‘Americanisation’ in the movie. By ‘Americanisation’, I mean using an American lead and playing up the exotic aspects of Singapore’s culture. By then, other new filmmakers like Eric Khoo and Jack Neo had risen to the fore from critical acclaim and box office success respectively.
'Tiger's Whip' a film made for the American market

History tends to attach labels and roles to characters, in order to simplify our understanding of evolution and change. It is not intuitively easy to point a finger at what Tony has contributed to the film movement in Singapore. He has done many things but has hardly built a reputation for himself in any particular field. But yet, one cannot deny his eager presence in the scene and his never-say-die spirit. By refusing to drop the curtains on local cinema in the late 70s, by holding on to blind faith with ’Medium Rare’, Singapore cinema’s ‘comeback shot’, he became somewhat a brave flag holder for Singapore cinema in its time of transition. Watching ‘Tony’s Long March’, there is a certain palpable sense of reckless optimism about him. He reminisced fondly about every new project that came along, and seemed hardly dented by the failures, only to laugh off the follies he made. Filmmaking was akin to driving a car through unknown terrain and lapping up the bumps and turns that came along the way. The state of filmmaking today is akin to a 90-degree turn from this as the industry has gained some footing over the years and filmmakers are a lot more cautious. If there is a term that encapsulates the kind of filmmaking that was happening during the industry’s transition then, it would be ‘trial-and-error’. And of course, nobody embodied ‘trial and error’ more than Tony.

Arguably, trial and error led Tony to make Singapore’s first kungfu flick ‘Ring of Fury’. Trial and error led to finding the means to making his second film. Tony shared an anecdote about getting his first burst of funding for his second film ’Two Nuts’ in which he met a financier named Mr Koh, a businessman who owned Golden Mile Cinema. Mr Koh asked what his film was about and Tony Yeow described it. Just after ten minutes, he asked Tony how much he needed. Tony replied and the next thing he did was summon in his secretary to prepare a cheque of S$40,000 for Tony. Tony added that at the point of time when he walked away with this cheque, Mr Koh barely knew who he was and had not even watched Tony’s ‘Ring of Fury’. In a later part of the documentary, Tony reflects on the performance of his films again and wonders if he would have made more successful films if he had been challenged more right at the beginning and not been offered money like the above-mentioned Mr Koh.
The experience with Mr Koh is perhaps also reflective of the times and the circumstances unique to the movie business at that time in Singapore. While the industry tide was on the decline in the late 70s and 80s, any attempt or flash of an idea to make a film might have been a welcome burst of wishful thinking that took the monotony out of a highly-industrialised Singapore. And wishful thinkers like Tony were few and far in between. Obviously, circumstances are different today and making a film is necessarily a more calculated and concerted attempt rather than a trial and error effort. Film producer Nicholas Chee thinks the real challenge filmmakers face today lies not in the first film for it has become relatively easy to get a first film made. After all, there is discernibly a bigger pool of professional talent and finances available today. The real challenge is being able to continue making your second, third, fourth film and more and achieving a reasonable amount of success each time. This calls for a lot of marketing savvy and business acumen in making a film and many filmmakers are still miles away. So, by today’s standards, Tony’s actually one lucky man who’s been able to repeatedly find financing for films. Either that, or back to the familiar lesson that it never hurts to try.


And when it comes to trying, this man has tried everything. Having survived the Japanese occupation, he’s been a TV producer, presenter, made the government’s ‘Stop at Two’ TV commercials and even acted in the original cast of local musical ‘Beauty World’. He embodies a certain spirit in late-80s, early-90s Singapore when the arts, theatre and film were not so institutionalised and less structured, where people came together, with whatever knowledge they had and tried to cook up a show. And the end-products were often surprising, sometimes explosive and always genuine. Things are noticeably different now. Many people are trained or schooled in strict disciplines, injecting a lot more professionalism into the trade. But I dare say, also more afraid of making mistakes. Not that it is any fault of theirs that they don’t experiment like their predecessors used to do but I think, and rather regrettably, many of us are caught in the industrialisation of art and film, where the margin for error is lower. At the end of ‘Remembering Tony’ the talk, I met the wife and son of Tony outside the theatre. We exchanged introductions and niceties and when I felt they had warmed up a little, I asked if his son was also dabbling in film. To which, Serene, Tony’s wife responded, ‘No, he’s in finance. More practical lah.’ A tinge of regret there but I guess Tony’s in a league of his own.

Written by Jeremy Sing

SINdie reviews: 1400

$
0
0

The most remarkable fact about 1400 was that it was even made at all. With no script, no funds, and little support, director Derrick Lui laboured through 7 years of production hell to finally finish the film in 2015. Thus, regardless of its stumbles, the film remains a Herculean accomplishment, and Derrick Lui certainly deserves praise for enduring where lesser men would have faltered.

In the same vein as the recent In the Room (although it was conceptualized and filmed long before its release), 1400 is an omnibus film set in a hotel, the eponymous 1400 in Geylang. It follows 4 different stories of love, and as each unfurls, seeks to weave them into a greater narrative about the nature of modern love.

For a shoestring budget, a feature debut, and with a director playing almost every single conceivable production role, 1400 is technically achieved. Sidestepping potential hurdles with a simplistic, minimalist set and certainly with deft skill, director Derrick Lui has each sequence glossed with a professional sheen, such that every frame is watchable, and nothing looks out of place.

And yet, the film is not without its troubles.


1400 is neither subtle nor abashed in its darker take on love, with the film segmented into vignettes, each labelled explicitly to signify loss, lust, etc. Unafraid to pursue the plotlines to their ends, however tragic or melancholic, it’s conceptually fresh among local films and dramas, who never seem to grapple honestly with love’s sombre realities. But the poignancy of whatever conclusions the film seeks to draw is neutered by bland and uninspired characterization. The fragmented and transient nature of the scenes starves the characters of badly needed screen time, and coupled with a weak dialogue that descends into stereotypes and platitudes, none of the characters progress meaningfully. The relationship between an aspiring songwriter and blind florist’s daughter seems like an import from mando-pop music videos, with both playing the role of idealistic lovebirds whose emotion and affection come assumed, and worse, remain unexplained. The sinful union of 2 adulterous professionals is rendered inane by conversations that rarely offer much to consider other than the fact that both are married, and bored. The story of an elderly widower who relives her touch through the services of prostitutes is a refreshing breather, with a more far better and more convincing character, but alas, it cannot save the rest.


Thematically, the film does not succeed to tie the disparate strings of its multiple plotlines into a cohesive whole. Yes, each plot is somewhat about love, but that is insufficient to justify any overarching theme. Each of the plotlines progress independent of one another, which can work for an omnibus film, except that the insights and conclusion each derives don’t mesh to create any unifying framework, and sometimes contradict each other. Throughout the film, the characters interact at the 1400 hotel, sharing dinner conversations and chance encounters, but their interactions are hollow: a lack of clarity as to what the film is trying to say, when translated down to the level of dialogue, often results in garbled interference. There are confusing mixed messages as well. The film does not end well for many of its characters, many of whom find their expectations ruined, or are consumed by their inner demons. And yet, the singer and his blind girlfriend manage to ride off into the sunset in an idealistic celebration of young love, which juxtaposed with the jarring realities of their parallel stories, seem foolhardy and perhaps even immature.

The acting itself is inconsistent. Vincent Lee, a veteran, plays his tragic character stalwartly, particularly in the moments of vulnerability. Although limited by poor scripting, Ya Hui delivers her lines as best as she can, and while nothing stellar, the scenes of intimacy survive scrutiny with her convincing acting. But somewhat cringe-worthy are Maria Alexander and William Luwandi, whose accents and mannerisms are so off that they only seek to reinforce the stereotype of an airheaded, pretentious middle class professional.

In conclusion, 1400 had an idea with potential and solid technicals, but when it came to the plot and some of acting, it was an uneven performance. Director Derrick Lui surely has the guts, and willingness to work with more difficult material, and my hope is that with a better team, and particularly with better scripting and casting, he can one day produce a great Singaporean film.


Singapore Heritage Short Film Competition: A Wistful Yet Lucid Glimpse Into Slices of Our Heritage

$
0
0
Heritage film. It's a phrase that local cinephiles greet with trepidation. Many are, after all, weary of the endless sepia filters, over-generous doses of sentimentality, and nostalgic voiceovers that seem to have become hallmarks of the genre.  So it's with relief that I say that the Singapore Heritage Short Film Competition, which organises an ongoing series of screenings (and is seeking new submissions for its next edition), might shatter some of your expectations.

Sure, not all of the entries were immune to the trappings that come with capturing the past and/or disappearing traditions, but after watching the entire crop of finalist shorts, concerns subside. As far as revealing snapshots of vanishing subcultures goes, the best submissions from this batch are clear-eyed and coherent, telegraphing a sense of loss without wallowing in it.

Kuda Kepang

I’m not sure if the Singapore Heritage Short Film Competition mandates all submissions to be styled as documentaries (it’s possible to capture Singapore’s heritage via fictional work, though certainly more difficult and resource-intensive), but all the finalist entries hewed to the non-fictional approach, for better or worse. You’ll find entries that are guilty of the usual cinematic sins found in documentaries: too much exposition via narration, for example – Beyond the Checkmate, an ambitious if somewhat sterile film that traces the 80-year history of Chinese chess in Singapore, does stumble in this regard, dumping overwhelming amounts of information at viewers via a monotonous voiceover.

Regardless, most of the films offered captivating glimpses into more esoteric slices of our heritage: the personal experiences of two Eurasians in the aptly titled I Am Eurasian; the dying practice of visiting graves at Bukit Brown cemetery during Qing Ming Festival; and the earliest form of signboard-making through traditional means in Tools of the Trade, among others.

What I admired most about the films was their refusal to surrender to "past is better" cliches; for the most part, they tend to avoid making grand statements about the changing landscape of Singapore and simply focus on their subject matters. I've resented films that have consistently hectored me to feel, feel, feel for the past, for dying traditions, and their tendency to conflate Old Singapore with "authenticity" (i.e. modern Singapore is not "authentic") sits uncomfortably with me, so it’s a relief the films here manage to conjure a sense of wonder and intimacy without committing to lazy cliches.

Beneath the Spikes

The top two prizes of the competition went to deserving entries: Kuda Kepang: Reviving the Culture, a wry, fascinating look at a stigmatised Javanese dance form where practitioners enter a trance; as well as Beneath the Spikes, which tells the real-life story of Hari, who undergoes more than 100 body piercings in the Hindu festival Panguni Uthiram, as a way of giving thanks to the deities for his son’s wellbeing. Both were technically competent, eschewing long, cumbersome chunks of narration in favour of smart, visual storytelling (shouldn’t they all?).

The SHSFC is now seeking submissions for its next edition. You can visit here for more information.

The State of Motion: A Tour of Rediscovery

$
0
0
I have to admit I was never much of a history buff. Still, the one afternoon retracing and relearning the history of local Cinema made me realize how grave a misconception I had, in thinking that the early Singapore was a cultural desert. The tour was almost an imploration to uncover my historical narrative again - not just where we came from, but how far our roots in art and culture have propagated.

This was the State of Motion tour that I was on, a twin programme (tour and exhibition) organized by Asian Film Archive, and a precious product of the extensive research done by artist and filmmaker, Toh Hun Ping. 



Armed only with excerpts from Cathay-Keris films shown to us and a head full of curiosity, the group of us packed into a cozy van that transported us to places of the past. Interestingly, the directors of Cathay-Keris films advocated shooting only on locations, using spaces such as existing kampongs and fusing popular spots to string the physical and imaginary narrative. 



We arrived at Outram Park, where Outram Prison once used to be. Unsurprisingly, it is now a barren field, with a surrealism heightened by an artwork that resembled a labyrinth of white mesh. It was meant to be a collaborative piece - encouraging more democratic forms of memorialization - but knowing that I could write whatever on the artist’s work actually made me feel nervous. Isn’t this monument too sacred to be drawn on? Yet, as I watched others pen their thoughts and well-wishes, I started to understand how art could coax our reflective process. 



The rest of the tour rolled forward nicely, save for the rain that burdened us with ponchos; we strolled down Queen Elizabeth Walk listening to the bizzare whisperings from an audio guide, I imagining myself as the lovesick protagonist in the film My Darling Love (1965). At Kampong Siglap, we were educated on the nuances of Sumpah Pontianak (1958); though the film appears to be a horror flick, it reflected the anxieties of society then, embodied in the female form. Along Pilot East Coast, the sculpture of a bus stop made of sand referenced the film Mat Tiga Suku (1965), but more ingeniously, made us question the notion of displacement and re-think the idea of a mirage.

That was what I found meaningful about the afternoon. It wasn't a mere lesson on films of the past, nor simply a revisit of locations that were filmed in the past, but a genuine provocation of thought through art, seeing, and being. 



Though at times, because the films had such vivid imagery (and memorably kitschy tunes), it was hard to reconcile its scenes with the actual locations today. Like how a quiet estate of private houses was a thriving kampong a mere 50 years ago. It was a rather bittersweet experience - witnessing how much we have progressed, yet knowing that all these quaint, singular spaces will never be again.

While I ended the tour feeling a little more knowledgable, there was also the painful awareness of how our history has been left behind. I would never sell nostalgia, but I do think that even as we reimagine a future in these evolving landscapes, the curiosity to discover our heritage should be ever expanding.

Written by Amelia Tan


State of Motion was a bus tour that retraced lost monuments of Singapore captured on film, with Singaporean artist and filmmaker, Toh Hun Ping through his extensive research on 20th century Singapore films and their filming locations. With a focus on a selection of classic Cathay-Keris films, audiences went on a trip to these film locations where an artwork responding to both the film and its site awaits them. 

ShoutOUT!: New Waves - Emerging Voices of Southeast Asian Cinema

$
0
0
The Singapore International Film Festival is presenting a series of dialogues called New Waves. This series shines a spotlight on young filmmakers who are making waves through the archipelago, forming an emerging community within Southeast Asia. Join them in a series of dialogues with Singaporean artists, writers and curators from different disciplines, as they recollect their entrance into cinema, their unique and personal approaches to utilising film as a mode of expression, and its convergence with other art forms and everyday life. Come participate in these open dialogue sessions to find out more about this emerging community of filmmakers in anticipation of the upcoming 27th edition of the Singapore International Film Festival.

Schedule:
Every last Wed of the month 8.00pm - 10.00pm

Dates:
27 Apr 2016: Gladys Ng: Capturing the Ephemeral (In dialogue with Yu-Mei Balasingamchow)
25 May 2016: He Shuming: Feminine/Masculine (In dialogue with Marc Nair)
29 Jun 2016: Tan Jingliang: A Place in Displacement (In dialogue with Adrianna Tan)
27 July 2016: Chulayarnnon Siriphol: Vanishing Memories - Between Video Art and Cinema (In dialogue with Chun Kai Qun)

31 Aug 2016: Truong Minh Quy: Into the Forest (In dialogue with Jennifer Teo)

Venue: *SCAPE Gallery (Level 5), 2 Orchard Link, Singapore 237978 Admission: Free Seating (Refundable $5 ticket via Peatix)


Info & Tickets: http://sgiff.com/newwaves


Tags: #newwaves #sgiff2016


Sessions:

Gladys Ng
Yu-Mei Balasingamchow
Gladys Ng [Singapore]
Capturing the Ephemeral (In dialogue with Yu-Mei Balasingamchow)
With soft-focuses and dreamy imagery, Gladys Ng has carved a niche in Singapore filmmaking with her distinct style and vision. She will be joined by local author and editor Yu- Mei Balasingamchow as they discuss the artistic craft of capturing the personal and the ephemeral. This session includes a screening of Gladys’ award-winning short, My Father After Dinner (Best Singapore Short Film, SGIFF Silver Screen Awards 2015) and a script reading.


He Shuming
Marc Nair
He Shuming [Singapore]
Feminine/Masculine (In dialogue with Marc Nair)
He Shuming is an experienced young filmmaker who has travelled the film festival circuit, worked in TV and new media across Asia-Pacific, and trained with LASALLE College of the Arts in Singapore and the American Film Institute Conservatory in Los Angeles. His works have a particular focus on the female experience, as evidenced by the constant use of women protagonists. Together with poet Marc Nair, Shuming will discuss his works and the emphasis on femininity in its myriad forms and situations. This session includes the screening of Shuming’s And the Wind Falls.


Tan Jing Liang
Adrianna Tan
Tan Jingliang [Malaysia]
A Place in Displacement (In dialogue with Adrianna Tan)
Born in Malaysia, Singapore-based Tan Jingliang has completed five short films including the celebrated The Transplants (2013) which premiered at the 43rd International Film Festival Rotterdam. She will be joined by nomadic social entrepreneur Adrianna Tan as they delve into the feeling of displacement in Jingliang’s work shot in Singapore and overseas, and the importance of travel, wanderlust, and the mobility of a filmmaker as a vessel for experiences. During the session, get a sneak peak into Jingliang’s work in progress, Notes in the Wind, alongside her short film, Open Sky.


Chulayarnnon Siriphol
Chun Kai Qun
Chulayarnnon Siriphol [Thailand]
Vanishing Memories - Between Video Art and Cinema (In dialogue with Chun Kai Qun)
Intersecting between video art and cinema, Chulayarnnon Siriphol is a prominent young artist with a slate of experimental films usually presented in galleries rather than cinema halls. He is often compared to his Thai film contemporaries Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Jakrawal Nilthamrong. Chulayarnnon will present excerpts of his earlier works, including Sleeping Beauty, which capture day and night in a hypnotic exercise; which eventually led to his short film, Vanishing Horizon of the Sea (Special Mention, SGIFF Silver Screen Awards 2014). In dialogue with artist-curator Chun Kai Qun, Chulayarnnon will talk about the experimental art of filmmaking, and the personal and political core of his playfully subversive projects. Both films will be screened during this session.


Truing Minh Quy
Jennifer Teo

Truong Minh Quy [Vietnam]
Into the Forest (In dialogue with Jennifer Teo)
A prominent voice from South Vietnam, Truong Minh Quy’s films deal with both his country’s
and his own personal histories, the disjuncture between urban and rural space, and an intimate relationship with natural landscapes where he invests his desire of things past and future. Joined by Jennifer Teo from Post-Museum who has mounted a series of community and art projects in Bukit Brown, both guests will discuss what it means when we enter a forest. This session includes the screening of Min-Quy’s short films, Someone is Going to Forest and Mars in the Well.


Call for Entry for SGIFF
The Singapore International Film Festival (SGIFF) is calling for submissions for its 27th edition, which will be held from 23 Nov - 4 Dec 2016 in various partner venues across the city. SGIFF is the largest and longest-running annual film event in Singapore comprising film screenings, masterclasses & talks, a film competition section, and development programmes for aspiring filmmakers and writers. Come 15 April 2016, independent filmmakers and aspiring directors, writers, critics may enter their new films (completed no earlier than 1 Jan 2015) or apply for the Southeast Asian Film Lab or Youth Jury & Critics Programme. Visit sgiff.com/submissions for details.

Submission Forms:
Available from 15 April 2016 at http://sgiff.com/submissions/ 

Submission Deadline:
22 Aug 2016, 6.00pm (GMT +8)

Entry Fees:
For Film Submissions

  • Regular phase submission: The Festival does not charge entry fees for film submissions made before 8 August 2016.
  • Late phase submission: The Festival will charge a submission fee of USD25 for films submitted in the final two weeks (8 August - 21 August 2016) of submission.

For Applications to the Southeast Asian Film Lab / Youth Jury & Critics Programme
- No entry fees. 

ShoutOUT!: Serving up FoodCine.ma, a film festival on food

$
0
0
'The Birth of Sake' by Erik Shirai
FoodCine.ma is a film festival on food. Presented by the creators of A Design Film Festival, it is a wide-angle, round-table take on contemporary food culture and subcultures.
The festival is launched in Singapore at anchor venue Objectifs from 29 April to 14 May 2016 with 8 feature-length films selected from over 80 international submissions. The festival programme includes satellite screenings that are paired with film-inspired menus, exhibitions on food culture, and a talk-show on the creative relationships between food, film and design.
Tickets are available online at tickets.foodcine.ma at $15 for regular screenings, $25 for the talk-show and $65 for satellite screenings.
Eight feature-length films selected from over international 80 submissions inaugurate the festival. With a World Premiere and seven Asia Premieres, the line-up takes us from the worlds of artisanal saké making and competitive baristaship to an Arctic seed bank and behind the scenes at top restaurants. Their discussions span ideas of food creation and consumption, its art and its politics.

Eight short films, including one looking at Hong Kong's cha chaan teng and another at Singapore's kopitiam, will be shared as bonus content to the screenings. A short film will be paired with and screened before each full-length feature.


Aside from the screenings at Objectifs, two off-site screenings, each paired with a film-inspired menu, will be held at House@Dempsey and Common Man Coffee Roasters.



TALK-SHOW: EAT DRINK FILM DESIGN

Festival curator Felix Ng will be joined by guests including Hong Kong film-makers Tian Ji and Adrian Lo to chat about the relationships between food, film, and design. More guests to be announced.
30 April, 12.30pm - 2.00pm
Important Links:
Website: www.foodcine.ma 
Facebook @foodcine.ma
Instagram @foodcine.ma
Twitter @foodcine_ma
'Barista' by Rock Baijnauth
'Tasteology' by Amanda Nordlow

Making music like they used to, in Xinyao

$
0
0


The Straws and Eric Moo
In Eva Tang’s documentary on Xinyao (made-in-Singapore Chinese folk music) ‘The Songs We Sang’ (TSWS), singer of former Xinyao trio The StrawsKoh Nam Seng said that pride and having an inferiority complex are two sides of the same coin. He was referring to the burgeoning of the Xinyao movement in the early 80s, running in parallel with the demise of Chinese education and the close of Nantah (Nanyang University). As government policies and the inevitable wave of commercialisation systematically reduced the prominence of the Chinese language, many among the Chinese-educated felt a need to reclaim what was being taken away, in the form of poetry and music creation that arose with a hint of defiance. 

This movement, which lasted about slightly more than a decade, spawned numerous hits, overcame many odds to gain prominence and sowed the seeds for the emergence of stars like Stefanie Sun and JJ Lin. Notably, it happened without government funding. People, especially students, formed Xinyao groups, purely out of passion and the movement resembled a huge national network of interconnected Chinese songwriting and singing CCAs. Just like the documentary itself, there is a mixed bag of emotions that accompanies being in the movement. Pride in asserting one's cultural identity. Sadness in losing the battle against the system. Rebellion in going against tide of having better English grades than Chinese grades. Adventure in the creating of original works in an arena where there were no rules. 

One look at the lyrics of many Xinyao songs reveals the bittersweet quality of Xinyao. The songs often sing of dealing with change, time, loss, friendships (seldom love), often set in the context of life in school and growing up, with an air of innocence right at the core and always treading a fine line between joy and regret. Like how there are good times…. which will come to an end, or how one can find tiny spark of simple joys in a hopeless place. The documentary, with its soul-wrenching prelude on Nantah’s chapter, actually does colour our perception of Xinyao, coercing us, mere observers, to feel this overhang of sadness surrounding music-making in the Chinese language.

But one must not forget that many people who participated in it were also in it for the joy of music-making and the warmth of brotherhood or sisterhood, making this a ‘happier’ movement that what the documentary depicted it to be. In fact, just 2-3 years into its being, Xinyao had become so infectious that its corps of participants across the different schools had become a formidable force hard not to notice. As singer Eric Moo relates in the documentary, people outside this circle, especially the ‘Speak English’ types, would look at them with envy of their unity and camaraderie. This was perhaps one of the best grassroots activities in more peaceful times.

Sadly, grassroots activities of this scale, sans the political ones, have seen their better days. To be fair, people movements are a product of their times. Xinyao flourished at a time when songwriting and music were the perfect tools to wield in culture politics and the answer to Singapore’s ‘cultural desert’ situation. In today's world, to express yourself, you can simply be a keyboard warrior and post something on social media. It is also a no-brainer a 'selfie' generation highly attuned to reality television, YouTube and other media trends where individuality is a commodity would find it difficult to make music like these groups used to. Interestingly, one look around you might suggest that the biggest grassroots activities today in Singapore are religious cell groups, whose purpose might be founded on the growing pressures and pains of living in the world’s most expensive city!

How about the filmmakers here? Do we call ourselves a filmmaking movement, industry, family, community or simply groupies?

Fundamentally, filmmaking, even at an independent level, is a different animal from the kind of independent music-making seen in Xinyao. Filmmaking is a long-drawn process, whose work moves in phases and relies on a considerable deal of technicality. In comparison, music-making has a less elaborate structure and can be said to be more instantly gratifying. In filmmaking, the roles people play are distinct and everyone from the cinematographer to the sound designer is almost an artist in their own field. In contrast, Xinyao performers relish in act of blending in and making a mark as a group, (sometimes even in various forms of colour coordination!). Some will even argue filmmaking is self-centred activity, driven by singular viewpoints. However, a keen observation of how independent filmmakers in Singapore have organised themselves reveals a heart-warming side to scene here.

Beyond the joint suppers at the neighbouring food court after screenings at the National Museum, filmmakers or the film community here has come together in some semblance of solidarity at various instances. During the Singapore International Film Festival, filmmakers took turns to moderate post-screening Q&As or even take visitors out for meals. Issues like censorship and the banning of films are classic cases in which filmmakers have banded together to act or petition. Groups like 13 Little Pictures operate like a brotherhood of die-hard filmmaking troopers who offer a bedrock of support to each other in skills, effort and time, while flying the flag of boundary-breaking cinema high. Filmmakers have also lent support to each other in being that word-of-mouth channel to promote each other's works.... which brings us to the origin of this article, what compelled me to watch 'The Songs We Sang' - strong words from another filmmaker.

Indeed, Xinyao grew under very special social circumstances that brought together pride, a sense of mission, a desire to challenge the tide, friendships, shared anxieties and common dreams as students. It would be unrealistic to expect music to be made in this way again, which explains why the film's nostalgia carries a lot of pain. But with it also comes a purpose, to remind us to return home to what makes us artists or creators, to keep that better side of that proverbial coin facing up.

Written by Jeremy Sing


Read our review of 'The Songs We Sang' by Jenson Chen here.

Viewing all 1157 articles
Browse latest View live